9/17/17
in St. Louis a heroin dealer flees the scene of the crime leading police on a high speed chase through the city endangering lives of drivers and pedestrians using the public streets. some time after the chase ends the police officer shoots and kills the heroin dealer after the police officer's partner yells that the heroin dealer has a gun and the other cop says that the heroin dealer went for the gun.
protesters protest after a judge decides that the police officer is not guilty of first degree murder.
who is ignorant?
- the heroin dealer?
- the cop?
- the judge?
- prosecutors?
- protesters?
- the rest of us?
here's what i believe:
- that the judge isn't ignorant
- that selling heroin is, and should be, a crime
- that a suspect fleeing police driving 87 mph on city streets commits
more crimes that endanger innocent people
- that cops have dangerous jobs
- that our law enforcement system isn't perfect
- that an imperfect justice system is better than no laws
8/30/17
looting, rioting, gang banging, assault, murder, etc.
why not get rid of all laws?
that's what the liberal media would like.
how would you like to live in a world with no laws?
where criminals can steal, vandalize, assault, murder, etc.--whatever and whenever they feel like it?
how would you feel if you were the victim?
congratulations, Tom Llamas. victims of looting, and all law abiding citizens everywhere, thank you for being a responsible citizen.
congratulations, Tom Llamas. victims of looting, and all law abiding citizens everywhere, thank you for being a responsible citizen.
No comments:
Post a Comment